Exploring the relationship between cervical spine biomechanics, vertebral artery blood flow, cerebral autoregulation, and emerging research investigating whether neck position influences circulation to the brain.
The human brain represents approximately 2% of total body weight, yet it receives a substantial proportion of the body's circulating blood supply.
This continuous circulation delivers oxygen and glucose necessary for neuronal signaling, cellular metabolism, and the maintenance of normal neurological function.
Unlike certain other tissues, the brain has limited capacity to tolerate interruptions in oxygen delivery.
Consequently, cerebral circulation is regulated through an intricate system of vascular, neurological, and metabolic processes designed to maintain appropriate blood flow despite changes in posture, activity, and physiological conditions.
But an interesting anatomical question emerges when we consider how blood reaches the brain.
Could the position and alignment of the cervical spine influence the blood vessels responsible for supplying the brain?
The major arteries traveling from the heart toward the brain pass directly through the neck. Among these, the vertebral arteries follow a particularly interesting course through the cervical vertebrae before entering the skull.
Because the cervical spine moves while these vessels must maintain circulation, the relationship between spinal biomechanics and vascular function has attracted scientific interest.
Some studies have identified changes in vertebral artery blood-flow measurements associated with cervical alignment or particular head positions.
Other investigations suggest that the body's regulatory systems generally preserve cerebral circulation during normal neck movements.
In 2019, researchers published a small study in Brain Circulation examining changes in magnetic resonance angiography measurements following temporary alteration of cervical lordosis.
More recent research has investigated the effects of head rotation, neck flexion and extension, spinal manipulation, and broader postural changes on vascular hemodynamics.
Together, these investigations raise important questions about the relationship between cervical mechanics and neurological health.
However, understanding the findings requires distinguishing three concepts that are frequently confused:
Blood flow through an individual neck artery, total blood flow reaching the brain, and actual perfusion of brain tissue are related—but they are not interchangeable measurements.
Recognizing these distinctions is essential for interpreting the research accurately.
1. Understanding the Blood Supply to the Brain
The brain receives arterial blood primarily through two paired vascular systems: the internal carotid arteries and the vertebral arteries.
The internal carotid arteries supply much of the anterior cerebral circulation, including large portions of the cerebral hemispheres.
The vertebral arteries contribute to the posterior circulation, supplying structures such as the brainstem, cerebellum, and posterior regions of the brain.
The vertebral arteries arise from the subclavian arteries and typically ascend through openings in the cervical vertebrae called the transverse foramina.
Near the skull, they pass around the upper cervical structures before entering the cranial cavity.
The two vertebral arteries subsequently join to form the basilar artery.
This arrangement places portions of the vertebral arterial system in close anatomical relationship with the cervical spine.
Unlike the internal carotid arteries, which generally travel through the neck without passing through the vertebral transverse foramina, the vertebral arteries must accommodate the movement of surrounding vertebrae.
This relationship is especially relevant during rotation and extension of the upper cervical spine.
However, the cervical vascular system is designed to tolerate normal movement.
Arteries possess mechanical properties that allow them to bend and adapt to changes in position.
The cerebral circulation also benefits from collateral vascular connections that can help redistribute blood under certain conditions.
These features explain why ordinary head movement generally does not produce clinically significant reductions in brain perfusion.
2. Cervical Lordosis: What Is the Normal Curve of the Neck?
The cervical spine normally demonstrates a degree of lordosis, meaning its sagittal alignment curves gently forward.
This curvature varies among individuals according to anatomy, age, positioning, and other factors.
Cervical alignment is commonly evaluated through radiographic measurements.
However, there is no single universally optimal cervical curvature that applies to every individual.
Some people naturally demonstrate relatively straight cervical alignment without significant symptoms.
Others may experience neck pain or movement limitations despite having a lordotic curve within commonly described reference ranges.
Consequently, cervical curvature should be interpreted alongside symptoms, clinical examination findings, and functional limitations rather than treated as a diagnosis by itself.
Nevertheless, sagittal alignment is relevant to cervical biomechanics.
Changes in alignment may alter how loads are distributed among vertebrae, intervertebral discs, muscles, and other supporting tissues.
Because the vertebral arteries pass through this region, researchers have questioned whether alignment differences might also influence vascular geometry and blood-flow characteristics.
This remains an evolving research question.
3. Does Loss of Cervical Lordosis Affect Vertebral Artery Blood Flow?
A 2016 study published in Medical Science Monitor, titled Decreased Vertebral Artery Hemodynamics in Patients With Loss of Cervical Lordosis, investigated this relationship.
Researchers compared 30 patients demonstrating reduced cervical lordosis with 30 control participants matched for age, sex, and body mass index.
Using Doppler ultrasonography, they measured several characteristics of vertebral artery hemodynamics.
These included vessel diameter, blood-flow volume, peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, and resistive index.
The researchers identified statistically significant differences in several measurements.
Participants with reduced cervical lordosis demonstrated smaller average vertebral artery diameters, lower flow volumes, and reduced peak systolic velocities compared with controls.
However, end-diastolic velocity and resistive index did not differ significantly.
The authors concluded that reduced cervical lordosis was associated with differences in vertebral artery hemodynamics.
This finding is interesting because it provides evidence of a measurable relationship between cervical alignment and local vascular characteristics.
However, several limitations are important.
The study was observational, meaning it could not determine whether reduced lordosis caused the vascular differences.
The researchers also did not establish that participants experienced reduced cerebral tissue perfusion or neurological dysfunction because of their cervical alignment.
Furthermore, differences in vertebral artery anatomy, vascular regulation, and other physiological characteristics may influence these measurements.
The study supports an association between cervical curvature and selected vertebral artery measurements—not proof that a straighter neck deprives the brain of oxygen.
4. The 2019 Brain Circulation Study: Can Changing Cervical Position Alter Cerebral Artery Measurements?
In 2019, Katz and colleagues published Increase in Cerebral Blood Flow Indicated by Increased Cerebral Arterial Area and Pixel Intensity on Brain Magnetic Resonance Angiogram Following Correction of Cervical Lordosis.
This study investigated whether temporarily modifying cervical alignment was associated with changes in brain magnetic resonance angiography measurements.
The researchers examined seven patients between 28 and 58 years of age who demonstrated reduced cervical lordosis or cervical kyphosis.
Participants underwent cervical radiography and brain MRA imaging.
Following their initial imaging, the researchers positioned a cervical extension orthotic beneath the neck to alter cervical curvature.
A second MRA examination was then performed.
The researchers analyzed the resulting images using pixel-intensity measurements in selected regions of cerebral vasculature.
Across the seven participants, they reported increases in measured MRA pixel intensity ranging from 23% to approximately 226%.
The authors interpreted these changes as potentially indicating increased cerebral blood flow following cervical repositioning.
The findings are intriguing, particularly because they suggest that cervical positioning may influence certain vascular imaging measurements.
However, several important methodological limitations prevent strong conclusions.
The Study Included Only Seven Participants
A sample of seven patients provides limited information about the consistency, magnitude, and clinical significance of an effect. Small studies are especially vulnerable to variability arising from individual anatomical differences, measurement procedures, and other uncontrolled factors.
There Was No Independent Control Group
Each participant served as their own comparison before and after the positioning intervention. Without a separate control or sham-positioning condition, it is difficult to determine whether observed changes resulted from the intervention itself or other factors associated with repeated imaging.
The Intervention Involved Temporary Neck Positioning
The researchers used a cervical extension orthotic to modify neck position during the imaging procedure. This does not establish that a permanent correction of resting cervical lordosis occurred.
It also does not demonstrate that conventional chiropractic manipulation would produce the same findings.
MRA Pixel Intensity Is Not Equivalent to Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion
One of the most important distinctions concerns how cerebral blood flow was measured. The researchers analyzed the brightness and area of vascular structures on MRA images. These measurements can be influenced by blood-flow characteristics, imaging conditions, vessel orientation, and other technical factors.
They are not equivalent to directly measuring the volume of blood perfusing brain tissue. The authors themselves acknowledged that the orthotic changed the angle of the head and cerebral vasculature, potentially influencing the imaging measurements.
Clinical Outcomes Were Not Established
The study did not demonstrate that the observed imaging changes improved cognition, reduced dizziness, prevented stroke, or produced other neurological benefits. Nor did it establish whether the measurements persisted after the orthotic was removed. The findings therefore represent preliminary observations rather than confirmation of a therapeutic effect.
The most scientifically appropriate conclusion is that temporary cervical repositioning was associated with changes in MRA vascular image measurements in seven patients, warranting further investigation using controlled designs and direct cerebral perfusion measurements.
5. What Happens to Vertebral Artery Blood Flow When We Turn Our Heads?
Cervical rotation is one of the most extensively investigated movements in relation to vertebral artery blood flow.
This is partly because the vertebral arteries must accommodate substantial movement around the upper cervical spine.
During head rotation, portions of the vertebral arteries may undergo bending, stretching, or changes in geometric configuration.
Some studies have reported reductions in blood-flow velocity or volume within the vertebral artery opposite the direction of rotation.
However, the physiological significance of these changes varies.
In 2019, Kranenburg and colleagues published a systematic review in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, titled Effects of Head and Neck Positions on Blood Flow in the Vertebral, Internal Carotid, and Intracranial Arteries.
The researchers reviewed 31 studies involving 2,254 participants.
Most studies investigating maximal cervical rotation did not identify statistically significant hemodynamic changes.
Other studies observed reductions in vertebral artery measurements during maximal rotation or combinations of rotation and extension.
The overall conclusion was that head and neck positioning generally influenced blood flow less than previously anticipated.
This finding is particularly important because it demonstrates that anatomical relationships do not automatically translate into clinically meaningful vascular compromise.
Although cervical movements can alter vascular geometry, normal circulation is generally maintained.
6. Why a Change in Vertebral Artery Flow Does Not Necessarily Mean Reduced Brain Perfusion
The brain does not depend on one artery operating independently.
It receives blood through interconnected vascular systems capable of responding to changing physiological circumstances.
For example, differences in blood flow between the left and right vertebral arteries are common.
Some individuals naturally have one dominant vertebral artery that carries a greater proportion of posterior circulation blood flow.
The contribution of each artery therefore varies.
A reduction in blood flow through one vessel does not necessarily produce an equivalent reduction in total cerebral blood supply.
Likewise, a change in blood-flow velocity does not always represent a proportional change in blood-flow volume.
The diameter of the vessel also matters.
A smaller vessel carrying blood at a higher velocity may transport less total blood than a larger vessel with a lower measured velocity.
This is why vascular studies must distinguish among diameter, velocity, volumetric flow, and tissue perfusion.
Additionally, the brain possesses regulatory mechanisms designed to maintain appropriate circulation despite changes in blood pressure or vascular resistance.
These mechanisms are collectively described as cerebral autoregulation.
7. Cerebral Autoregulation: How the Brain Maintains Its Blood Supply
Cerebral autoregulation describes the mechanisms through which cerebral blood vessels adjust their resistance to help maintain appropriate blood flow across a range of physiological conditions.
When systemic blood pressure changes, cerebral vessels may constrict or dilate to help regulate circulation.
Neuronal activity, carbon dioxide concentrations, metabolic demand, and autonomic influences also contribute to cerebrovascular regulation.
This system is particularly important because the brain must maintain adequate oxygen delivery during ordinary activities such as standing, walking, bending, and exercising.
However, cerebral autoregulation has limits.
Severe hypotension, vascular obstruction, traumatic injury, and certain neurological or cardiovascular conditions can overwhelm normal compensation.
The important point is that the relationship between neck-vessel measurements and brain perfusion is mediated by several regulatory processes.
Consequently, identifying reduced flow in one artery does not establish that the brain is experiencing inadequate oxygen delivery.
This concept is supported by newer research investigating neck position and cerebral blood-flow regulation.
8. Does Neck Flexion or Extension Change Blood Flow Inside the Brain?
A 2023 study published in Physiological Reports, titled Steady-State Cerebral Blood Flow and Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation During Neck Flexion and Extension in Seated Healthy Young Adults, directly investigated this question.
The researchers evaluated 15 healthy adults during sustained neck flexion and extension.
Participants maintained each position while cerebral blood-flow velocity and other hemodynamic parameters were measured.
The study identified a difference in estimated cerebral perfusion pressure between flexion and extension.
However, there were no statistically significant differences in mean middle cerebral artery blood-flow velocity.
The researchers also found no significant differences in their measurements of dynamic cerebral autoregulation.
These results are informative because they suggest that changes in neck position or estimated perfusion pressure do not necessarily result in measurable changes in intracranial arterial velocity.
However, the study involved healthy young adults and did not directly measure regional brain-tissue perfusion.
Its findings therefore should not automatically be generalized to individuals with significant vascular disease or complex cervical pathology.
Nevertheless, they reinforce the importance of studying actual cerebrovascular outcomes rather than assuming that changing cervical position necessarily improves or impairs circulation.
9. What Happens to Cerebral Blood Flow After Cervical Spinal Manipulation?
An especially relevant question for chiropractic care is whether spinal manipulation changes cerebral circulation.
In 2019, researchers published a randomized crossover trial in BMJ Open titled Effect of Cervical Manipulation on Vertebral Artery and Cerebral Haemodynamics in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain.
The study included 20 participants experiencing chronic neck pain.
Researchers measured vertebral artery and cerebral hemodynamics using MRI-based methods.
Participants underwent maximal cervical rotation and cervical manipulation in randomized order.
The investigators identified some changes in vertebral artery measurements associated with head rotation.
However, they did not find statistically significant changes in cerebral perfusion following cervical manipulation or maximal rotation.
These results suggest that the interventions did not produce meaningful, sustained changes in measured cerebral circulation within this small study population.
Importantly, the findings do not establish that cervical manipulation improves blood flow to the brain.
They also do not establish that manipulation is universally safe for every patient.
The study evaluated a limited sample and did not continuously measure flow during the intervention itself.
Transient vascular changes could therefore have been missed.
This research nevertheless provides a useful comparison with the earlier cervical-lordosis case series.
The two studies used different interventions and imaging methods, and their findings should not be treated as directly interchangeable.
The broader message is that demonstrating a change in neck position or local vascular measurements is not the same as demonstrating improved cerebral perfusion following chiropractic treatment.
10. When Cervical Position Really Can Compromise Blood Flow: Rotational Vertebral Artery Syndrome
Although normal head movement generally preserves cerebral circulation, certain structural abnormalities can produce clinically significant vascular compromise.
One example is rotational vertebral artery syndrome, sometimes called Bow Hunter's syndrome.
This rare condition occurs when particular head or neck positions mechanically narrow or obstruct a vertebral artery.
The obstruction may be associated with anatomical abnormalities, degenerative changes, osteophytes, fibrous structures, or other mechanical factors.
Symptoms can occur during a specific head position and improve when the individual returns to a neutral position.
Possible manifestations include vertigo, imbalance, visual disturbances, faintness, or other symptoms associated with posterior circulation ischemia.
However, these symptoms are not specific to rotational vertebral artery syndrome.
Many more common vestibular, neurological, and cardiovascular conditions can produce similar complaints.
Diagnosis requires specialized vascular evaluation.
In selected cases, dynamic vascular imaging may demonstrate positional narrowing or occlusion.
The existence of this condition establishes that cervical positioning can affect vertebral circulation under particular pathological circumstances.
But it does not mean that ordinary cervical misalignment commonly causes impaired brain perfusion.
Nor does it establish that spinal manipulation is an appropriate treatment for suspected vascular compression.
Patients with concerning positional neurological symptoms require appropriate medical assessment.
11. Cervical Hypermobility, Structural Abnormalities, and Vascular Mechanics
The relationship between cervical biomechanics and neurovascular function becomes more complicated in individuals with certain structural or connective tissue disorders.
For example, patients with significant instability or abnormalities at the craniocervical junction may experience altered mechanical relationships among vertebrae, vessels, neural tissues, and supporting structures.
In 2024, researchers published Impact of Craniocervical Junction Abnormality on Vertebral Artery Hemodynamics: Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis in Frontiers in Neurology.
The study used computational methods to examine how anatomical abnormalities might influence vertebral artery hemodynamics.
Such research can help identify potential mechanisms involving vessel geometry, flow characteristics, and vascular stress.
However, computational models depend on assumptions about anatomy, tissue mechanics, and physiological conditions.
They cannot independently establish the clinical consequences of a particular abnormality.
Similarly, a 2024 review titled Neuraxial Biomechanics, Fluid Dynamics, and Myodural Regulation investigated complex relationships among connective tissue properties, neural structures, and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hypermobility-associated disorders.
These studies offer important hypotheses concerning the mechanical environment surrounding neurological structures.
However, they do not establish that routine chiropractic treatment can reverse vascular abnormalities, correct intracranial pressure disorders, or improve cerebral perfusion.
For patients with suspected cervical instability or vascular pathology, careful assessment and appropriate specialist collaboration are essential.
12. What Additional Nature and Springer Research Contributes
Several recent Nature Portfolio and Springer Nature publications help clarify the physiological complexity of blood-flow regulation.
A 2025 review published in Spinal Cord, titled Spinal Cord Vascular Autoregulation: Key Concepts and Opportunities to Improve Management, examines how the central nervous system regulates perfusion under changing physiological conditions.
The authors describe important differences between cerebral and spinal cord vascular regulation, including the challenges of measuring spinal cord blood flow.
Their review discusses why posture may be particularly relevant when autoregulatory mechanisms are impaired, such as following spinal cord injury.
This research does not demonstrate that changing cervical curvature improves cerebral perfusion.
Instead, it reinforces that vascular regulation depends on multiple interconnected mechanisms and that meaningful conclusions require validated physiological measurements.
A separate 2025 study examining prolonged head-down tilt found that cervical blood vessels responded differently to changes in posture.
Some vertebral artery measurements changed while others remained relatively stable.
Total measured blood-flow volume was comparatively preserved despite regional differences.
These findings provide another example of why local vascular measurements cannot automatically be interpreted as changes in overall cerebral circulation.
Emerging research therefore supports a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between posture and vascular physiology.
Posture and vascular mechanics interact, but their clinical significance depends on the individual, the vascular system being measured, and the capacity of normal regulatory mechanisms to maintain perfusion.
13. Can Poor Posture Cause Brain Fog, Dizziness, or Cognitive Decline Through Reduced Blood Flow?
This is a particularly important question because claims involving posture and cerebral blood flow frequently appear in wellness and chiropractic marketing.
Some discussions suggest that forward-head posture, straightening of the cervical curve, or other alignment changes routinely reduce oxygen delivery to the brain.
These explanations are appealing because they connect a visible mechanical finding with complex neurological symptoms.
However, the available evidence does not establish this relationship as a common clinical mechanism.
Dizziness can arise from vestibular disorders, migraine, cardiovascular conditions, medication effects, autonomic dysfunction, and other neurological or medical causes.
Cognitive difficulties and brain fog are similarly nonspecific.
They may occur in association with sleep disorders, medical illnesses, psychological conditions, medication effects, and numerous other factors.
Although certain vascular disorders can impair cerebral perfusion and produce neurological symptoms, their diagnosis requires appropriate clinical evaluation.
A cervical radiograph showing reduced lordosis does not establish cerebral hypoperfusion.
Nor does improvement in cervical alignment demonstrate that cerebral blood flow or cognitive function has improved.
The scientifically appropriate approach is to investigate the patient's actual symptoms and relevant clinical findings rather than assume that a structural variation explains them.
14. Cervical Vascular Safety: Why Differential Diagnosis Matters
The anatomical relationship between cervical structures and blood vessels is particularly relevant to clinical safety.
Certain vascular conditions can initially present with symptoms resembling musculoskeletal neck pain.
One important example is cervical artery dissection.
Dissection involves injury to the arterial wall and can contribute to narrowing, clot formation, or other complications.
It is an important cause of stroke, particularly among younger adults.
A 2024 scientific statement from the American Heart Association emphasized that cervical artery dissection may occur without major trauma and can present with symptoms such as neck pain, headache, dizziness, or neurological disturbances.
These symptoms can sometimes resemble more common musculoskeletal complaints.
Consequently, clinicians assessing cervical pain must remain alert for possible vascular causes.
The International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists has developed a cervical assessment framework emphasizing clinical reasoning and identification of potential vascular pathology before manual treatment.
Importantly, traditional provocative positional tests cannot reliably rule out cervical arterial disease.
A patient tolerating a particular neck position without dizziness does not establish that manipulation is safe.
New severe or unusual headache or neck pain—especially when accompanied by neurological symptoms—requires appropriate medical evaluation.
Warning signs can include double vision, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, weakness, marked incoordination, or other sudden neurological changes.
Such symptoms require emergency medical assessment rather than routine cervical treatment.
A safe chiropractic approach must distinguish musculoskeletal complaints from potentially serious neurological or vascular conditions before selecting an intervention.
15. Does Restoring Cervical Lordosis Improve Cerebral Blood Flow?
This is the central clinical question raised by the uploaded 2019 study.
The current evidence does not provide a definitive answer.
The small case series reported changes in vascular MRA image intensity after temporary cervical repositioning.
The earlier 2016 observational study identified differences in vertebral artery measurements among patients with reduced cervical lordosis.
These findings justify further research into the relationship between cervical alignment and vascular hemodynamics.
However, neither study established that restoring cervical lordosis produces a sustained increase in cerebral tissue perfusion.
Likewise, neither demonstrated that changing curvature prevents neurological disease, improves cognition, or reduces stroke risk.
Other investigations have found that cerebral circulation remains relatively stable during many cervical movements and after selected manual interventions.
Therefore, it would be premature to recommend cervical curve correction specifically as a strategy for increasing blood supply to the brain.
Future research could help clarify these questions through randomized controlled trials, larger participant samples, direct perfusion imaging, standardized measurements, and long-term follow-up.
Researchers would also need to determine whether any measured vascular changes produce clinically meaningful improvements in patient health.
Until such evidence is available, cervical alignment interventions should be selected for appropriate musculoskeletal or functional indications rather than assumed cerebrovascular benefits.
16. What Does This Mean for Chiropractic Patients?
For patients considering chiropractic treatment, the most relevant question is not whether every cervical alignment variation affects cerebral circulation.
It is whether their symptoms, examination findings, and functional limitations indicate a condition that may benefit from appropriate musculoskeletal care.
Neck pain, reduced mobility, movement intolerance, and selected headache presentations may respond to conservative interventions.
Depending on the individual, these may include therapeutic exercise, manual therapy, education, ergonomic modifications, and graded activity.
However, symptoms suggesting vascular or neurological disease require a different diagnostic pathway.
Similarly, patients experiencing dizziness or unusual neurological symptoms should not assume that cervical posture explains their condition.
Appropriate examination may involve neurological assessment, vestibular evaluation, cardiovascular measurements, or referral for specialized medical testing.
The most effective care begins with determining what problem is actually present.
17. Our Approach to Cervical Spine and Neurological Health
We recognize that the cervical spine occupies an important anatomical and functional position between the head and the rest of the body. Its structures contribute to musculoskeletal movement, proprioceptive signaling, neurological communication, and the mechanical environment surrounding important vascular structures.
Our approach to chiropractic care emphasizes comprehensive clinical reasoning rather than assuming every neck-related symptom arises from a single mechanical cause.
For patients experiencing cervical pain or functional limitations, assessment may include cervical mobility, muscular function, relevant neurological findings, movement control, and other appropriate clinical measures.
When symptoms suggest vestibular, vascular, neurological, or autonomic involvement, additional assessment or referral may be indicated.
We also recognize that structural measurements, imaging findings, and physiological measurements must be interpreted according to their actual clinical significance.
For example, identifying reduced cervical lordosis does not automatically establish that a patient requires curve correction.
Similarly, a patient's neurological symptoms should not be attributed to impaired blood flow without appropriate evidence.
Our goal is to help patients understand the relationships among structure, function, and health while providing individualized, evidence-informed recommendations.
When clinically appropriate, chiropractic care may be integrated with physiotherapy, therapeutic exercise, movement rehabilitation, and collaborative healthcare services.
Importantly, we do not represent cervical manipulation or posture correction as established treatments for cerebral hypoperfusion or vascular disease.
Instead, we aim to identify appropriate musculoskeletal treatment targets while recognizing the importance of medical investigation when symptoms extend beyond the expected presentation of a mechanical disorder.
Conclusion: The Relationship Between Neck Position and Brain Circulation Is Real—but More Complex Than It Appears
The cervical spine and cerebral vascular systems share an important anatomical relationship.
The vertebral arteries travel through the cervical region, where they must accommodate changes in head and neck position while maintaining circulation to the posterior brain.
Research demonstrates that certain cervical positions can influence vertebral artery hemodynamics.
Studies have also identified associations between reduced cervical lordosis and selected vascular measurements.
However, these findings must be interpreted in the context of cerebral autoregulation, collateral circulation, individual vascular anatomy, and the limitations of current measurement methods.
Most healthy individuals maintain adequate cerebral circulation during ordinary neck movements.
Clinically important vascular compromise is possible under certain pathological conditions, but these presentations require specialized assessment rather than routine assumptions about posture.
The existing evidence does not establish that chiropractic adjustments or cervical lordosis correction reliably increase cerebral tissue perfusion or prevent neurological disease.
Nevertheless, understanding the anatomical and physiological relationships between cervical structures and vascular function remains valuable.
It can improve clinical reasoning, inform future research, and reinforce the importance of identifying serious conditions that may initially resemble routine neck pain.
The value of modern chiropractic care is not in claiming that every postural abnormality restricts blood flow to the brain. It is in understanding how cervical biomechanics, neurological function, and vascular anatomy interact—and using that knowledge to guide appropriate assessment, safe treatment decisions, and interdisciplinary care.
We believe this distinction is central to delivering personalized, research-informed healthcare that respects both the complexity of human physiology and the limits of current scientific evidence.
Research References
Katz EA, Katz SB, Fedorchuk CA, Lightstone DF, Banach CJ, Podoll JD. Increase in cerebral blood flow indicated by increased cerebral arterial area and pixel intensity on brain magnetic resonance angiogram following correction of cervical lordosis. Brain Circulation. 2019;5:19–26. https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_25_18
Bulut MD, Alpayci M, Şenköy E, et al. Decreased vertebral artery hemodynamics in patients with loss of cervical lordosis. Medical Science Monitor. 2016;22:495–500. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.897500
Kranenburg HAR, Tyer R, Schmitt M, et al. Effects of head and neck positions on blood flow in the vertebral, internal carotid, and intracranial arteries: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2019;49:688–697. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.8578
Moser N, et al. Effect of cervical manipulation on vertebral artery and cerebral haemodynamics in patients with chronic neck pain: a crossover randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025219
Kato T, Konishi T, Kurazumi T, Ogawa Y, Iwasaki KI. Steady-state cerebral blood flow and dynamic cerebral autoregulation during neck flexion and extension in seated healthy young adults. Physiological Reports. 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15622
Zhang Z, Ai X, Xu Y, et al. Impact of craniocervical junction abnormality on vertebral artery hemodynamics: based on computational fluid dynamics analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2024;14:1244327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1244327
Frost N, Barclay SJ. Neuraxial biomechanics, fluid dynamics, and myodural regulation: rethinking management of hypermobility and CNS disorders. Frontiers in Neurology. 2024;15:1479545. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1479545
Routkevitch D, et al. Spinal cord vascular autoregulation: key concepts and opportunities to improve management. Spinal Cord. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01126-5
Heterogeneous and lateralized cervical vascular responses to a 7-day head-down tilt bed rest. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41102208/
Rushton A, Carlesso LC, Flynn T, et al. International Framework for Examination of the Cervical Region for Potential of Vascular Pathologies of the Neck Prior to Musculoskeletal Intervention: International IFOMPT Cervical Framework. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2023;53:7–22. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2022.11147
Yaghi S, Engelter S, Del Brutto VJ, et al. Treatment and outcomes of cervical artery dissection in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2024;55–e106. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000457
Vascular flow limitations affecting the cervico-cranial region: understanding ischaemia. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2023;27:100493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100493