Understanding how the timing of stressful experiences influences brain development, emotional regulation, and long-term adaptation—and why supportive environments matter throughout life.
Why might the same stressful experience affect a child, an adolescent, and an adult differently?
Consider three individuals facing a major life transition.
A young child moves away from familiar caregivers and routines. An adolescent enters a new school where social belonging and peer acceptance become increasingly important. An adult relocates for a career opportunity while managing financial responsibilities and family obligations.
Although all three individuals experience significant change, they do not encounter those demands with identical neurological capabilities, developmental needs, or coping resources.
Their brains are at different stages of development.
Their experiences, relationships, and capacities for self-regulation also differ.
Consequently, the timing and context of stressful experiences may influence how individuals respond and adapt.
This relationship is an important focus of developmental neuroscience.
In 2016, neuroscientist Oscar Marín published a perspective in Nature Medicine titled Developmental Timing and Critical Windows for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders.
The article explored how the developing brain passes through periods of heightened sensitivity during which biological and environmental influences can have particularly important consequences.
Marín proposed that understanding these developmental periods could help researchers identify when certain interventions might be most effective.
Although the article focuses on neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders, its broader scientific framework raises important questions for understanding stress and resilience.
How does the developing brain learn to identify threats?
How do early experiences influence emotional regulation?
Why might some individuals become more sensitive to later stressors while others demonstrate remarkable resilience?
And how can supportive environments help individuals develop the capabilities necessary to manage life's demands?
More recent research published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Molecular Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, and Nature Mental Health has expanded our understanding of these relationships.
Together, these findings point toward an important principle:
The effects of stress depend not only on what happens to us, but also on when it happens, how long it lasts, and the biological, psychological, and social resources available to help us adapt.
1. The Brain Is Not Fully Developed at Birth
Human brain development is a prolonged biological process.
It begins during prenatal development and continues through childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood.
During this period, neural cells proliferate, migrate, establish connections, and form increasingly specialized networks.
Several major developmental processes contribute to this maturation.
Neurogenesis involves the generation of neurons.
Synaptogenesis involves the formation of connections among neurons.
Myelination improves the efficiency of communication along many neural pathways.
Synaptic pruning involves the selective modification and elimination of connections as neural circuits become more specialized.
These processes do not occur uniformly throughout the brain.
Different regions and networks mature along different developmental trajectories.
For example, sensory systems involved in processing visual or auditory information generally develop earlier than some of the higher-order networks involved in planning, cognitive control, and complex decision-making.
This extended developmental process creates opportunities for learning and adaptation.
However, it also means that environmental influences may interact differently with neural systems depending on their stage of maturation.
2. What Are Critical and Sensitive Periods?
A central concept in Marín's 2016 review is the existence of developmental windows.
A critical period refers to a relatively restricted developmental interval during which particular experiences are necessary for the typical development of a biological function.
A sensitive period refers more broadly to a developmental interval during which the brain is especially responsive to particular experiences.
Although the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, the distinction matters.
Sensitive periods do not necessarily mean that learning or adaptation becomes impossible later in life.
Rather, they describe periods when certain experiences may exert unusually strong developmental influences.
A classic example involves visual development.
During early life, visual experience helps organize neural circuits responsible for processing visual information.
Significant disruption of visual input during particular developmental periods can have lasting consequences.
The same principle has encouraged researchers to investigate sensitive periods involving language, social behavior, emotional learning, and other functions.
However, the timing and strength of sensitive periods differ among systems.
The development of emotional regulation cannot be reduced to the same developmental timeline as visual processing.
Similarly, evidence from animal models does not always translate directly to humans.
The broader lesson is that neurological development is dynamic.
The biological significance of an experience depends partly on the developmental state of the systems receiving and processing it.
3. Why Timing Changes the Effects of Stress
Stress involves a coordinated response to demands that challenge, threaten, or exceed an individual's available resources.
These demands can be physical, psychological, social, or environmental.
The body's response may involve changes in attention, autonomic activity, endocrine signaling, immune function, and behavior.
During early development, these responses occur within neural networks that are still being organized.
Consequently, stressful experiences may interact with processes involved in establishing future patterns of perception, emotional regulation, and behavior.
For example, an experience that repeatedly signals unpredictability may influence how an individual learns to anticipate environmental conditions.
A child exposed to consistent, supportive caregiving may develop expectations that distress can be addressed through dependable relationships.
A child experiencing persistent instability may encounter greater difficulty predicting whether support will be available.
These are not universal outcomes.
Individual differences in temperament, genetics, caregiving, and other circumstances influence development.
Nevertheless, the timing of environmental experiences provides important context for understanding their potential effects.
4. How Early Adversity Can Influence Brain Architecture
A 2025 review published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Early Adversity Alters Brain Architecture and Increases Susceptibility to Mental Health Disorders, examines how adverse experiences may influence neural development.
The authors discuss several forms of early adversity, including maltreatment, exposure to violence, and unsafe environments.
Drawing on human neuroimaging and experimental animal research, the review describes how early experiences may interact with developing neural systems.
These include networks involved in threat processing, emotional regulation, executive function, and social behavior.
Importantly, the consequences of early adversity are not uniform.
Differences in the type, severity, timing, and duration of exposure may contribute to different developmental outcomes.
The review also emphasizes that developmental vulnerability cannot be separated from the broader environment.
Children experience stress within families, schools, neighborhoods, and social systems.
Therefore, understanding development requires considering both individual biology and environmental conditions.
A crucial distinction is that adversity is associated with increased vulnerability, not inevitable psychiatric illness.
Many individuals exposed to adversity do not develop a psychiatric disorder.
5. The Developing Stress Response: The HPA Axis and Autonomic Nervous System
Two important components of physiological stress regulation are the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system.
The HPA axis coordinates hormonal responses to various physiological and psychological challenges.
Its activity involves signaling among the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and adrenal glands.
One important outcome is the secretion of cortisol.
Cortisol participates in metabolic regulation, immune signaling, and other adaptive processes.
The autonomic nervous system contributes to cardiovascular regulation, respiration, digestion, and many other physiological functions.
During challenging circumstances, sympathetic activity may increase to support an appropriate response.
Parasympathetic mechanisms also contribute to physiological regulation and recovery.
However, these systems do not operate as a simple on-and-off switch.
Their activity is influenced by circadian rhythms, developmental stage, physical health, medication use, and other factors.
Research suggests that early environmental conditions can influence the development of stress-response systems.
Nevertheless, no single cortisol concentration or heart rate variability measurement can reliably identify a person's childhood experiences or establish whether they have adequate psychological resilience.
These measures are influenced by numerous biological and contextual variables.
The relevant scientific question concerns patterns of adaptation rather than one isolated physiological reading.
6. How the Brain Learns What Is Safe and What Is Threatening
The brain continuously evaluates information about the environment.
This process draws on sensory information, memory, previous experiences, and expectations.
Neural systems involving the amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and related networks contribute to different aspects of threat processing and emotional regulation.
The amygdala participates in processing biologically significant information, including potential threats.
The hippocampus contributes to memory and contextual learning.
Prefrontal networks participate in attention, decision-making, and aspects of emotional regulation.
These structures work through interconnected circuits rather than functioning independently.
During development, experience can influence how these networks organize and communicate.
For example, repeated exposure to unpredictable or threatening circumstances may affect expectations about environmental safety.
This could contribute to heightened attention toward potential threats.
In some situations, heightened vigilance may be adaptive.
However, persistent vigilance can carry costs when it interferes with sleep, attention, or social functioning.
Importantly, the brain's response to adversity should not automatically be characterized as defective.
Some responses may represent adaptations to environmental conditions.
The challenge is determining whether those adaptations remain useful when circumstances change.
7. GABAergic Interneurons and Developmental Plasticity
One of the more detailed neurobiological discussions in Marín's 2016 article concerns GABAergic interneurons.
GABA, or gamma-aminobutyric acid, is a major neurotransmitter involved in regulating neural activity.
During early brain development, the effects of GABA can differ from those observed in mature neural circuits.
Changes in intracellular chloride regulation influence whether GABA signaling is more depolarizing or inhibitory.
These developmental changes contribute to the organization of neural networks.
Marín emphasizes the importance of fast-spiking interneurons expressing parvalbumin.
These cells contribute to the timing and coordination of neuronal activity.
Their maturation is involved in regulating particular critical periods of cortical plasticity.
Researchers have investigated whether disruptions in the development of these circuits contribute to certain neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions.
However, this literature does not establish that ordinary psychological stress directly causes a generalized GABA deficiency.
Nor does it justify attempting to manipulate GABA signaling through supplements or medications as a routine stress-management strategy.
The broader relevance is developmental.
Neural systems regulating information processing and behavior mature through processes that can be sensitive to biological and environmental conditions.
8. Neuroplasticity: How Experience Shapes the Developing Brain
Neuroplasticity refers to the nervous system's capacity to change its structure or function in response to experience, learning, and other influences.
It is a fundamental feature of development.
As children learn language, movement skills, emotional regulation, and social behaviors, neural networks adapt through experience-dependent processes.
However, neuroplasticity is not always synonymous with improvement.
The nervous system can adapt to supportive environments, but it can also adapt to chronic adversity.
For example, experiences involving persistent unpredictability may influence how individuals anticipate future events.
These adaptations can affect behavior even after the original circumstances have changed.
Nevertheless, the brain retains the capacity for learning and adaptation throughout life.
Adult neuroplasticity differs from the heightened sensitivity of certain developmental periods, but it does not disappear.
This is an important distinction because discussions of childhood adversity sometimes imply that early experiences permanently determine future functioning.
The evidence does not support such a deterministic conclusion.
9. Can Early Stress Leave Long-Lasting Molecular Changes?
One emerging research area involves epigenetic regulation.
Epigenetic mechanisms influence how genes are regulated without necessarily changing the underlying DNA sequence.
Examples include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling.
These processes contribute to normal cellular development and function.
A 2026 review in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Early Life Experiences, the Neural Epigenome and Affective Disorder Risk, examines how early stress may influence epigenetic regulation during sensitive developmental periods.
The authors describe evidence that adversity can be associated with changes in gene regulation, neural maturation, and later stress susceptibility.
Importantly, these effects differ according to cell type, brain region, developmental stage, and the specific environmental experience.
Animal models provide much of the detailed mechanistic evidence.
Human studies offer complementary observations but cannot always establish cause and effect.
These findings should therefore not be interpreted as proof that an adverse childhood experience permanently changes an individual's genetic destiny.
Epigenetic processes are dynamic and context-dependent.
Furthermore, commercially available epigenetic tests cannot currently provide a validated diagnosis of an individual's childhood stress history or reliably predict their future psychiatric health.
The scientific importance lies in understanding how environmental experiences can interact with biological regulation across time.
10. Why Adolescence Is a Particularly Important Developmental Period
Adolescence involves substantial changes in brain development, endocrine function, social behavior, and identity formation.
During this period, individuals increasingly seek independence while developing more complex relationships and responsibilities.
The brain continues refining systems involved in planning, decision-making, emotional regulation, and reward processing.
A 2026 review in Molecular Psychiatry, Young Minds in Distress: Exploring the Global Rise in Youth Mental Health Diagnoses, examines the developmental factors contributing to mental health vulnerability during adolescence.
The authors discuss differences in the developmental timing of emotional and cognitive-control systems.
However, adolescence should not be understood simply as a period of poor judgment or inadequate self-control.
It also represents an important opportunity for learning, exploration, independence, and social development.
The social environment becomes particularly relevant.
Peer relationships, belonging, academic demands, family support, and environmental expectations may all contribute to how adolescents experience stress.
Consequently, effective support should be developmentally appropriate.
Strategies suitable for adults may not adequately address the emotional and social realities of adolescence.
11. Predictability, Caregiving, and the Developing Nervous System
A particularly relevant development in recent research concerns environmental predictability.
The August 2026 issue of Nature Mental Health highlighted studies investigating how inconsistent routines, caregiving, and household conditions may contribute to later psychological difficulties.
This research suggests that environmental unpredictability may provide information about developmental risk beyond some conventional measures of childhood adversity.
Predictability can help individuals anticipate demands and understand what is likely to happen next.
For children, developmentally appropriate routines and dependable caregiving may provide opportunities to learn emotional regulation and manage uncertainty.
However, healthy environments do not require perfect consistency.
Children benefit from age-appropriate novelty, exploration, flexibility, and manageable challenges.
The objective is not to eliminate every source of uncertainty.
It is to provide enough safety, support, and stability for development to occur within a manageable range of demands.
This distinction is essential.
Resilience develops through supported adaptation, not through the complete absence of stress.
12. Resilience: Why Adversity Does Not Determine the Future
Not everyone exposed to early adversity develops lasting psychological difficulties.
A 2025 review published in Neuropsychopharmacology, Neurobiology of Resilience to Early Life Stress, examines mechanisms associated with adaptive outcomes following adversity.
The researchers discuss how individuals differ in their responses to stressful experiences.
These differences may involve genetics, neural processes, developmental timing, and environmental support.
Resilience is not simply the ability to endure hardship without experiencing distress.
Nor is it a fixed personality trait that someone either possesses or lacks.
A more useful understanding recognizes resilience as a dynamic process involving adaptation under challenging circumstances.
Protective factors may include supportive relationships, access to resources, opportunities to develop coping skills, and environments that allow recovery.
The significance of these factors varies according to the individual and the nature of the adversity.
This perspective is important because it avoids placing the entire responsibility for resilience on the individual.
A person's capacity to adapt depends partly on the resources and conditions available to them.
13. Can Stress Experiences Influence Responses to Future Stressors?
Recent experimental neuroscience suggests that previous adversity can influence how neural circuits respond to later challenges.
A September 2026 Nature study, An Amygdala to Anterior Hypothalamic Circuit Gates Stress Sensitivity, investigated neural circuits associated with heightened stress sensitivity following previous adversity.
Using mouse models, researchers identified changes involving the anterior hypothalamic nucleus and its interactions with threat-related neural networks.
The findings provide mechanistic evidence that prior stress can influence future stress responses through specific neural pathways.
However, these experiments were conducted in animals.
They do not establish that identical mechanisms explain every instance of human stress sensitivity.
Nor do they demonstrate that one stressful event permanently sensitizes the human brain.
Nevertheless, the research supports a broader principle: the nervous system's response to a current challenge can be influenced by previous experiences.
This is one reason personal history matters when evaluating stress.
Two individuals facing similar external demands may experience those demands very differently.
14. Why Stress Is Not Always Harmful
Discussions of stress and brain development can inadvertently suggest that children should be protected from all challenges.
However, stress is a normal part of life.
Learning new skills, navigating disagreements, adapting to unfamiliar environments, and pursuing meaningful goals can involve discomfort and physiological activation.
Some challenges provide opportunities to develop competence and coping skills.
The distinction lies in the characteristics of the stressor and the support available.
A manageable challenge with appropriate recovery and assistance may promote learning.
Persistent, overwhelming, or threatening experiences without adequate support may carry different consequences.
This is why stress should not be evaluated solely according to its intensity.
Duration, predictability, controllability, developmental stage, and available resources also matter.
The goal of effective stress management is not to eliminate every demanding experience.
It is to help individuals develop adaptive responses while reducing harmful or unmanageable exposures.
15. Why Early Intervention Is Scientifically Appealing
Marín's 2016 review proposes that understanding developmental windows could help researchers identify more effective intervention timing.
The central argument is that some biological processes may be easier to influence before neural circuits become more established.
In experimental models, certain interventions delivered during development have produced different effects than those administered later.
This raises the possibility that some future treatments could be tailored to specific developmental stages.
However, important limitations remain.
Animal findings do not always translate to humans.
Many psychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions involve complex, heterogeneous mechanisms.
Researchers also cannot reliably predict which at-risk individuals will develop a particular psychiatric disorder.
Furthermore, interventions during development may produce unintended consequences.
For these reasons, experimental findings about critical periods should not be interpreted as justification for preventive medication or unvalidated neurological interventions in otherwise healthy children.
The more immediate lesson for broader healthcare concerns timely recognition of developmental needs and access to appropriate support.
16. What Does Developmental Neuroscience Teach Us About Stress Management?
One of the most useful implications of this research is that stress-management strategies should account for developmental context.
Young children often depend heavily on caregivers for emotional regulation.
As children mature, they develop greater capacities for communication, problem-solving, and self-regulation.
Adolescents face additional challenges involving identity, autonomy, social belonging, and increasingly complex expectations.
Adults may have more developed cognitive and behavioral resources, but they also face different responsibilities and environmental demands.
Therefore, one universal stress-management strategy is unlikely to serve every population equally well.
For a young child, appropriate support may emphasize stable routines, responsive caregiving, adequate sleep, and developmentally suitable opportunities for play and learning.
For adolescents, support may involve healthy relationships, appropriate autonomy, manageable expectations, physical activity, sleep, and access to trusted adults.
For adults, relevant strategies may include identifying chronic stressors, strengthening coping resources, improving recovery habits, and modifying environmental demands where possible.
These approaches are not substitutes for treatment of psychiatric disorders.
They are general principles for supporting well-being and adaptive functioning.
17. The Importance of Sleep During Development
Sleep supports learning, memory, emotional regulation, and numerous physiological processes.
Sleep needs and circadian timing change across development.
Adolescents, for example, commonly experience a biological shift toward later sleep timing.
When school schedules and other obligations require early waking, insufficient sleep can become a significant concern.
Sleep disruption may contribute to difficulty concentrating, emotional reactivity, and reduced capacity to manage daily challenges.
Stress can also interfere with sleep, creating a bidirectional relationship.
A comprehensive approach to developmental stress therefore considers both sleep quantity and sleep timing.
However, persistent sleep disturbances require appropriate evaluation.
Conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia, and other sleep disorders cannot always be resolved through routine lifestyle advice alone.
18. Social Connection and Co-Regulation
Humans develop within social environments.
Relationships provide opportunities for learning, emotional support, cooperation, and shared problem-solving.
During childhood, supportive caregivers can help children interpret challenging experiences and develop regulatory skills.
This process is often described as co-regulation.
Over time, repeated experiences of appropriate support can contribute to the development of increasingly independent self-regulation.
However, the quality and safety of relationships matter.
Frequent social interaction does not necessarily provide emotional security.
Likewise, relationship difficulties can become sources of stress.
This is why developmental stress management should consider the relational environment rather than focus exclusively on the individual's coping techniques.
For adolescents and adults, supportive relationships can continue to provide resources for adaptation.
The capacity to seek assistance is not a failure of resilience.
It is often an important component of it.
19. What About Adults Who Experienced Significant Childhood Stress?
Research on sensitive periods can raise understandable concerns among adults who experienced adversity earlier in life.
However, developmental sensitivity does not imply that later change is impossible.
The adult brain retains substantial capacities for learning and adaptation.
Psychological treatment, supportive relationships, changes in environmental conditions, and appropriate lifestyle interventions may improve functioning and quality of life.
The relevant approach depends on the individual's needs.
Some people may benefit from psychotherapy addressing trauma-related symptoms, anxiety, or depression.
Others may require support involving sleep, chronic pain, substance use, occupational demands, or medical conditions.
Some individuals demonstrate strong psychological and social functioning despite difficult early experiences.
Therefore, childhood adversity should not be treated as a universal explanation for adult symptoms.
Nor should clinicians assume that an individual has an underlying trauma history based solely on physiological measurements, personality traits, or stress-related complaints.
A respectful approach prioritizes the person's present experience, goals, preferences, and appropriately established clinical findings.
20. The Ecobiopsychosocial Perspective: Stress Across the Lifespan
The emerging science of developmental stress reinforces the importance of a comprehensive model of health.
Biological factors influence how the nervous system develops and responds to challenges.
Psychological factors affect interpretation, coping, learning, and behavior.
Social relationships influence access to protection, emotional support, and practical resources.
Environmental conditions shape exposure to demands, opportunities, and constraints.
These domains interact continuously.
For example, a child experiencing unstable housing may also experience disrupted sleep, interrupted education, and reduced access to supportive activities.
An adolescent facing persistent social exclusion may experience emotional distress that interferes with sleep and academic functioning.
An adult managing chronic illness may experience additional occupational or financial demands.
The consequences cannot always be understood through one isolated mechanism.
An ecobiopsychosocial approach considers how biological, psychological, social, and ecological conditions interact across time.
It also recognizes that individuals have different histories, capabilities, resources, and adaptive needs.
21. How This Research Informs Stress Well
Our Stress Well philosophy recognizes that stress does not occur independently of an individual's developmental history, current environment, lifestyle, and available coping resources.
The emerging science of sensitive periods and neuroplasticity provides a valuable educational foundation for understanding these relationships.
We recognize that people differ in the way they perceive and respond to challenges.
These differences can reflect current circumstances, physiological health, previous experiences, learned behaviors, and environmental conditions.
Our approach emphasizes practical education and individualized support involving stress-related lifestyle factors.
Depending on the individual's circumstances, relevant topics may include sleep, physical activity, daily routines, recovery habits, social support, and strategies for managing environmental demands.
We also emphasize the importance of understanding what a person is being asked to adapt to.
Sometimes improving stress management involves developing new skills.
At other times, it involves reducing avoidable demands, improving support, or changing environmental conditions.
For children and adolescents, concerns involving development, significant emotional distress, trauma, or suspected psychiatric conditions require appropriately qualified pediatric, developmental, or mental health professionals.
The neuroscience of developmental windows does not establish that health coaching can prevent psychiatric disorders or reverse early developmental alterations.
Rather, it reinforces the importance of timely support, appropriate referral, and environments that promote healthy development.
For adults, this research can also provide a useful perspective on the relationship between past experiences and present stress responses without assuming that personal history determines future outcomes.
Our objective is to help individuals understand the multiple factors shaping stress and identify realistic opportunities to support health and adaptive capacity.
Conclusion: Stress Is Not Just About the Challenge—It Is Also About the Timing
The developing brain is extraordinarily adaptable.
Throughout childhood and adolescence, neural circuits undergo extensive changes that support learning, emotional regulation, social behavior, and increasingly complex forms of cognition.
These processes create opportunities for growth.
However, they also produce periods during which particular experiences may exert lasting developmental influences.
Research on critical and sensitive periods helps explain why the timing of environmental exposures matters.
More recent studies have expanded this framework by examining early adversity, neural architecture, epigenetic regulation, stress sensitivity, and resilience.
Together, these findings suggest that stress cannot be understood solely according to the intensity of an external event.
Its consequences also depend on developmental stage, duration, predictability, previous experiences, and the resources available to support adaptation.
Importantly, early adversity does not determine an individual's future.
The nervous system retains capacities for change, and supportive environments can contribute to healthier developmental and behavioral outcomes.
For stress management, this leads to a broader understanding of prevention and resilience.
Supporting long-term well-being is not simply about teaching individuals to tolerate greater stress. It is about recognizing when people are most vulnerable, identifying the resources they need, and helping create conditions in which healthy adaptation becomes possible.
We believe that understanding these relationships offers a more comprehensive perspective on stress across the lifespan—one that considers biology, development, behavior, relationships, and environment as interconnected dimensions of human health.
Research References
Marín O. Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Nature Medicine. 2016;22:1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4225
Nelson CA, Sullivan EF, Valdes V. Early adversity alters brain architecture and increases susceptibility to mental health disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2025;26:642–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-025-00948-9
Cunningham AM, Maze I. Early life experiences, the neural epigenome and affective disorder risk. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2026;27:659–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-026-01074-w
Torres-Berrío A, Bortolami A, Peña CJ, Nestler EJ. Neurobiology of resilience to early life stress. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2026;51:29–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02158-4
Peña CJ. Epigenetic regulation of brain development, plasticity, and response to early-life stress. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2026;51:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02179-z
Gotlib IH, Uy JP, Buthmann JL, Pine DS. Psychobiological mechanisms underlying the association between early life stress and depression in adolescence. Molecular Psychiatry. 2026;31:1085–1094. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03348-8
Pennington ZT, LaBanca AR, Mahmud AN, et al. An amygdala to anterior hypothalamic circuit gates stress sensitivity. Nature. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11075-5
Nakayama H, Miyata M. Adolescent stress remodels synapses in the sensory thalamus and impairs tactile discrimination in mice. Communications Biology. 2025;8:1678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09075-8
Chiang HL, Chien YL, Gau SSF. Young minds in distress: exploring the global rise in youth mental health diagnoses. Molecular Psychiatry. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03884-x
Storm and stress: trajectories of youth mental health. Nature Mental Health. 2026;4:1187–1188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-026-00710-9
Lewis S. Early life stress primes future stress vulnerability. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-026-01075-9