Understanding how the gut microbiome communicates with the brain through neural, immune, endocrine, and metabolic pathways—and why nutrition is emerging as an important influence on whole-person health.
What if the food we eat influences not only our metabolism and digestive health, but also the biological signals reaching our brain?
For generations, nutrition has been understood primarily through the nutrients required to support human life.
Proteins supply amino acids necessary for cellular structure and function.
Carbohydrates provide important sources of metabolic energy.
Dietary fats contribute essential fatty acids and support cellular membranes, hormone production, and numerous other physiological processes.
Vitamins and minerals participate in thousands of biochemical reactions necessary for normal functioning.
However, contemporary nutritional science increasingly recognizes another important dimension of food.
What we eat also influences the microorganisms living within our gastrointestinal tract—and those microorganisms produce signals that can interact with the nervous system.
The human gastrointestinal tract contains an extraordinarily complex ecosystem of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi, and other microorganisms.
Collectively, these communities are described as the gut microbiota, while the term microbiome often refers to the microorganisms and their collective genes, functions, and surrounding environment.
These organisms participate in numerous processes relevant to human health.
They help metabolize dietary compounds, produce biologically active molecules, interact with immune cells, and influence the intestinal environment.
Researchers have also discovered that signals associated with microbial activity can interact with neural systems involved in appetite, stress regulation, gastrointestinal sensation, and other aspects of brain function.
This interconnected communication network is known as the microbiota–gut–brain axis.
In 2019, neuroscientist John Cryan and an international group of colleagues published a landmark review titled The Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis in Physiological Reviews.
Spanning more than 130 pages, the review synthesized research from microbiology, neuroscience, gastroenterology, immunology, endocrinology, and behavioral science.
Its central message was that communication between the gut and brain cannot be fully understood without considering the microbial communities inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract.
In 2024, Cryan and colleagues revisited this field in Nature Metabolism with a review titled Feeding Gut Microbes to Nourish the Brain: Unravelling the Diet–Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis.
Their updated work placed greater emphasis on nutrition as a potential influence on microbial functions and brain health.
Other recent research published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, Nature Reviews Immunology, Nature Mental Health, and Nature has further clarified the mechanisms through which these systems communicate.
Together, these advances support an important principle:
Nutrition does more than supply the body with nutrients. It also influences the biological environment and microbial activities that participate in communication between the gastrointestinal tract and nervous system.
Understanding this relationship offers a more comprehensive perspective on personalized nutrition, digestive function, and long-term well-being.
1. What Is the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis?
The microbiota–gut–brain axis describes the bidirectional communication network connecting intestinal microorganisms, the gastrointestinal system, and the central nervous system.
The word bidirectional is particularly important.
Information travels from the gut toward the brain, but the brain also influences gastrointestinal physiology and the environment in which microbes live.
For example, signals arising from the intestine can influence appetite and digestive regulation.
Conversely, neural and hormonal responses to psychological stress may affect gastrointestinal motility, secretion, and other processes that shape the intestinal environment.
Cryan and colleagues describe several major communication pathways.
These include the autonomic nervous system, enteric nervous system, gastrointestinal hormones, immune signaling, and microbial metabolites.
Importantly, there is not one single gut–brain pathway.
The axis represents a collection of interacting systems.
Some signals arise from sensory receptors in the intestinal wall.
Others involve metabolites produced through microbial fermentation.
Still others reflect immune activity or the physiological consequences of changes in gastrointestinal function.
The significance of each pathway depends on the individual and the biological circumstances.
2. The Gut Microbiome: An Ecosystem Within an Ecosystem
The intestinal microbiome is not a static collection of organisms.
It is an ecological community influenced by both the host and surrounding environment.
Different microorganisms compete for nutrients, cooperate through metabolic exchanges, and respond to changing intestinal conditions.
Some microorganisms specialize in metabolizing complex carbohydrates.
Others participate in the transformation of proteins, bile acids, or host-derived compounds.
The metabolic products generated by one species may subsequently become substrates for another.
This process is sometimes described as microbial cross-feeding.
Consequently, the effects of one microorganism cannot always be understood independently of the surrounding community.
The 2019 Physiological Reviews article emphasizes substantial differences among individuals in microbiome composition.
Some of these differences reflect genetics and developmental history.
Others are associated with diet, medications, environment, age, physical activity, and other factors.
This variability complicates the interpretation of microbiome testing.
Two healthy individuals may have substantially different microbial compositions.
Likewise, the presence or absence of one particular bacterial species does not necessarily establish whether an entire microbial ecosystem is functioning appropriately.
The emerging scientific emphasis is therefore shifting from identifying which organisms are present toward understanding what those organisms are doing.
3. How the Gut Communicates With the Brain Through the Nervous System
One important communication pathway involves the autonomic nervous system.
The autonomic nervous system regulates many physiological processes that occur without conscious effort.
These include cardiovascular function, digestion, and aspects of respiratory regulation.
Within the gastrointestinal system, autonomic pathways interact with the enteric nervous system.
The enteric nervous system contains extensive neural networks embedded within the gastrointestinal tract.
These networks coordinate local digestive processes, including motility and secretion.
They also communicate with the central nervous system.
The Role of the Vagus Nerve
The vagus nerve is an important component of gut–brain communication.
It contains sensory fibers that convey information from internal organs toward the brainstem, along with motor pathways involved in autonomic regulation.
However, the vagus nerve does not function as a simple direct communication cable between bacteria and the brain.
Most intestinal microorganisms remain within the gastrointestinal lumen.
Their influence on vagal signaling often involves intermediary processes, including intestinal epithelial cells, sensory receptors, hormones, and microbial metabolites.
A 2025 review published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, Microbiota–Neuroepithelial Signalling Across the Gut–Brain Axis, explains how specialized intestinal sensory cells interact with nearby nerve fibers.
The authors describe the intestinal neuroepithelial interface as a potentially important site where microbial and dietary information becomes integrated into neural communication.
This helps explain how events occurring inside the intestine may influence the nervous system without microorganisms physically traveling to the brain.
4. The Gut Can Detect Microbial Signals and Communicate Them to the Brain
An especially interesting discovery was published in Nature in July 2025.
In A Gut Sense for a Microbial Pattern Regulates Feeding, researchers investigated whether intestinal sensory cells could respond directly to molecular features associated with microorganisms.
Using mouse models, the researchers identified a pathway involving bacterial flagellin.
Flagellin is a protein associated with the flagella of many bacteria.
The investigators found that flagellin activated Toll-like receptor 5 in a population of specialized colonic sensory cells.
This subsequently influenced peptide YY signaling and vagal sensory pathways involved in feeding behavior.
The study demonstrated a mechanistic route through which microbial information could influence neural circuits participating in appetite regulation.
However, the experiments were conducted in mice.
They do not establish that the same pathway can currently be manipulated through dietary supplements to reliably change human appetite or weight.
Nevertheless, the findings illustrate how sophisticated gut–brain communication can be.
The nervous system may receive information not only about nutrients, but also about characteristics of the microorganisms inhabiting the intestinal environment.
5. The Gut–Brain Axis Is Also an Immune Communication Network
The gastrointestinal tract contains a substantial portion of the body's immune infrastructure.
This makes sense because the intestine must continuously encounter food components, microorganisms, and substances arriving from the outside environment.
The intestinal immune system must distinguish among harmless exposures, beneficial microorganisms, and genuine threats.
It also needs to maintain appropriate responses to tissue injury and infection.
The gut microbiota contributes to this regulatory environment.
Microbial products can interact with immune cells and influence inflammatory signaling.
In turn, immune activity can alter the composition and behavior of microbial communities.
The 2019 Cryan review discusses several pathways involving inflammatory cytokines and other immune mediators.
These signals may influence nervous system activity through circulating factors, neural communication, and changes in physiological state.
A 2025 review in Cellular & Molecular Immunology, Beyond the Gut: Decoding the Gut–Immune–Brain Axis in Health and Disease, expands this discussion.
The authors describe how immune mechanisms interact with microbial activity and neurological function.
However, immune activation is not inherently harmful.
Appropriate inflammatory responses are essential for protection and repair.
The relevant concern is whether immune regulation becomes inappropriate for the circumstances.
Likewise, identifying differences in immune markers among individuals with neurological conditions does not automatically demonstrate that the gut microbiome caused those conditions.
6. Microglia: The Brain's Immune Cells and Their Relationship With the Gut
Microglia are specialized immune-related cells residing in the central nervous system.
They participate in immune surveillance, responses to injury, and processes associated with neural development and maintenance.
Their functions extend beyond inflammation.
Microglia also contribute to interactions involving synaptic remodeling and other aspects of neural function.
One of the most interesting findings discussed in the 2019 Physiological Reviews paper concerns experiments involving germ-free animals.
Germ-free animals are raised without exposure to normal microbial communities.
Researchers have identified differences in microglial development and function in some germ-free mouse models.
Certain microbial metabolites have also been implicated in these effects.
A 2025 Nature Reviews Immunology perspective, A Role for Microglia in Mediating the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis, examines this evidence in greater detail.
The authors explore how gut microbial signals may interact with microglial development and function across the lifespan.
However, the strongest mechanistic evidence largely comes from experimental animal models.
It does not establish that probiotics, dietary fiber, or commercial microbiome interventions can reliably modify human microglia to treat neurological disease.
The research is important because it reveals potential communication pathways between the body's microbial environment and the brain's immune-regulatory systems.
7. Microbial Metabolites: How Food Becomes Biological Information
One of the most direct ways nutrition influences the microbiota–gut–brain axis is through microbial metabolism.
The nutrients and other compounds reaching the intestine help determine which biochemical reactions microbial communities perform.
Microorganisms can transform dietary substances into metabolites with biological activity.
Some of these compounds interact with intestinal epithelial cells.
Others enter the circulation or influence endocrine and immune pathways.
Several categories of microbial metabolites have attracted particular scientific interest.
These include short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan-derived compounds, secondary bile acids, and certain amino acid metabolites.
However, the biological effects of these molecules depend on their concentrations, location, receptor interactions, and broader physiological context.
The production of a metabolite is not automatically beneficial.
Some microbial products support normal physiology, while others may contribute to pathological processes under particular circumstances.
This is why microbiome research increasingly requires detailed metabolomic analysis rather than simple bacterial abundance measurements.
8. Short-Chain Fatty Acids: Connecting Dietary Fiber With Cellular Signaling
Short-chain fatty acids are produced primarily through microbial fermentation of certain dietary carbohydrates.
Three commonly studied short-chain fatty acids are acetate, propionate, and butyrate.
These compounds participate in several physiological processes.
Butyrate is an important energy substrate for colonocytes, the cells lining the colon.
Short-chain fatty acids can also influence receptor signaling, immune regulation, and aspects of metabolic function.
Their effects are not limited to supplying energy.
Researchers have investigated how short-chain fatty acids may interact with the nervous system through endocrine, immune, and other signaling pathways.
Animal studies suggest that certain microbial metabolites can influence microglial development and selected neural functions.
However, circulating concentrations and direct effects on human brain function remain areas of investigation.
A 2025 review in Nature Reviews Microbiology, The Gut Microbiome and Dietary Fibres: Implications in Obesity, Cardiometabolic Diseases and Cancer, examines the diverse effects of dietary fibers on microbial ecology and metabolism.
The authors emphasize that dietary fibers are a heterogeneous group of substances.
Different fibers are fermented to different degrees and can produce different microbial responses.
Consequently, the effects of fiber depend on the specific compound, the individual's microbiome, and the surrounding dietary pattern.
9. Tryptophan Metabolism: A Connection Between Nutrition, Microbes, and Neurochemistry
Tryptophan is an essential amino acid obtained through the diet.
It participates in several important metabolic pathways.
One involves serotonin synthesis.
Another involves the kynurenine pathway, which produces compounds with diverse biological functions.
Intestinal microorganisms can also metabolize tryptophan into molecules such as indole and related derivatives.
These compounds may influence intestinal receptors, immune function, and other signaling processes.
The 2019 Cryan review identifies tryptophan metabolism as one of the major pathways relevant to microbiota–gut–brain communication.
However, an important misconception deserves clarification.
Although a substantial amount of the body's serotonin is produced within the gastrointestinal system, circulating serotonin does not simply cross the blood–brain barrier and directly increase serotonin concentrations inside the brain.
Central serotonin synthesis and peripheral serotonin production are physiologically distinct processes.
Gut-derived signals may influence the nervous system through several indirect pathways, but the relationship cannot be reduced to the claim that gut bacteria manufacture serotonin for the brain.
Similarly, changing dietary tryptophan intake does not guarantee a predictable improvement in mood or cognitive performance.
The scientific value lies in understanding how nutrient metabolism and microbial activity interact with broader neurobiological regulation.
10. The Gut–Brain Axis and the Intestinal Barrier
The intestinal barrier plays a central role in regulating exchanges between the gastrointestinal lumen and the internal environment.
It consists of several interacting components.
These include the mucus layer, intestinal epithelial cells, intercellular junctions, immune defenses, and microbial communities.
The barrier must allow nutrient absorption while limiting inappropriate movement of microorganisms and potentially harmful substances.
A 2024 Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology article, Gastrointestinal and Brain Barriers: Unlocking Gates of Communication Across the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis, examines how barrier functions contribute to communication between the gastrointestinal tract and nervous system.
The review describes how intestinal and blood–brain barriers maintain specialized biological environments.
Researchers are investigating whether microbial metabolites and inflammatory processes influence the regulation of these barriers.
However, changes in experimental permeability measurements do not automatically establish clinically significant barrier disease.
Furthermore, abnormal results from unvalidated commercial tests should not be interpreted as proof that a person has a neurological condition caused by intestinal permeability.
Appropriate diagnosis requires validated testing and a relevant clinical presentation.
11. Nutrition Is One of the Most Important Modifiable Influences on the Microbiome
The intestinal microbiome is shaped by numerous factors.
Some, such as developmental history and aspects of host genetics, are not readily modifiable.
Others, including diet, medications, physical activity, and environmental exposures, can change over time.
Diet is particularly important because it supplies substrates for microbial metabolism.
A 2024 review published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, The Interplay Between Diet and the Gut Microbiome: Implications for Health and Disease, examines how dietary patterns affect microbial composition, diversity, and function.
The authors emphasize that diets can influence microbial communities through multiple mechanisms.
Dietary fiber provides substrates for fermentation.
Proteins contribute amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds.
Dietary fats can influence bile acid secretion and metabolism.
Polyphenols and other plant-derived compounds can undergo microbial transformation.
However, microbial responses vary among individuals.
The same dietary intervention does not necessarily produce identical changes in every microbiome.
This variation is one of the major reasons personalized nutrition is receiving increasing attention.
12. Why Plant Diversity May Matter
Plant foods contain many compounds that interact with the intestinal microbiome.
These include dietary fibers, resistant starches, polyphenols, and other substrates.
Different plants provide different combinations of these compounds.
As a result, consuming a variety of plant foods may support a broader range of microbial metabolic activities than repeatedly consuming only a narrow selection.
Examples include vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and seeds.
However, there is no universally validated number of plant species that every person must consume to establish a healthy microbiome.
Likewise, greater microbial diversity is not automatically beneficial in every biological context.
Certain healthy microbial communities naturally have lower diversity, and some disease-associated communities can also demonstrate high diversity.
The objective should therefore not be to maximize one microbiome metric at all costs.
Rather, the emphasis should remain on dietary adequacy, tolerance, and the overall health benefits of varied nutrient-rich foods.
For people with gastrointestinal disorders or specific dietary restrictions, adjustments may be necessary.
13. Fermented Foods, Probiotics, and Psychobiotics
Fermented foods are produced through controlled microbial activity.
Examples include yogurt, kefir, certain fermented vegetables, and other traditional foods.
Some fermented products contain live microorganisms.
Others may contain few viable microorganisms by the time they are consumed.
Importantly, fermented foods are not automatically equivalent to clinically validated probiotics.
A probiotic is a live microorganism that, when administered in adequate amounts, confers a demonstrated health benefit.
Those benefits are often strain-specific.
The term psychobiotic has been used to describe microorganisms or microbiota-targeted interventions investigated for potential effects on psychological or neurological outcomes.
The 2019 Cryan review discusses early research involving probiotics, prebiotics, and related interventions.
Some studies demonstrated changes in stress-related or behavioral outcomes.
However, many early human trials were small.
More recent investigations have continued to identify promising findings, but results remain variable.
A 2024 Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology review, Fermented Foods and Gastrointestinal Health: Underlying Mechanisms, emphasizes the importance of evaluating fermented foods according to their actual biological properties and demonstrated effects.
The review cautions against assuming that all fermented products confer identical benefits.
This distinction is especially important when discussing mental health.
No probiotic strain or fermented food should be presented as a universally effective treatment for depression, anxiety, or neurological disease.
14. What Does Research Say About Nutrition and Psychological Well-Being?
Dietary patterns have been associated with psychological health in numerous observational studies.
However, these associations are difficult to interpret because nutrition is closely connected with other aspects of life.
People with different dietary patterns may also differ in physical activity, sleep, income, healthcare access, medication use, and social circumstances.
Psychological symptoms may themselves influence appetite, food selection, and eating behavior.
This introduces the possibility of reverse causation.
Nevertheless, randomized dietary intervention studies suggest that improving overall diet quality may benefit selected psychological outcomes.
The 2024 Nature Metabolism review by Schneider and colleagues discusses the emerging relationship between dietary patterns, microbial metabolism, and brain health.
Its broader conclusion is that nutrition provides a plausible and potentially modifiable influence on gut–brain communication.
However, the specific contribution of microbiome changes to improvements in psychological outcomes is often uncertain.
A healthier dietary pattern can influence many physiological processes independently of the microbiome.
Therefore, demonstrating improved mood after a dietary intervention does not automatically establish that microbial changes caused the improvement.
15. Why Stress and the Microbiome Influence One Another
The microbiota–gut–brain axis is not only relevant to nutrition.
It also interacts with stress physiology.
Psychological stress can influence gastrointestinal function through neural and hormonal pathways.
Changes in intestinal motility, secretion, and immune activity may alter the environment experienced by resident microorganisms.
Conversely, microbial metabolites and gut-derived signals may influence physiological pathways involved in stress responsiveness.
The 2019 Cryan review describes extensive experimental evidence supporting these interactions.
However, many detailed mechanistic findings derive from animal research.
Human stress responses are influenced by numerous additional factors, including sleep, illness, nutrition, medications, and environmental circumstances.
Consequently, it is premature to interpret a microbiome test as a direct measure of psychological stress.
The research nevertheless provides another example of why nutrition, sleep, stress, and gastrointestinal function should not be considered completely separate domains of health.
16. Microbiome Research and Neurological Disease: What Is Established?
The 2019 review discusses emerging research involving the microbiome and several neurological and psychiatric conditions.
These include Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder, anxiety, depression, and other conditions.
Since its publication, researchers have identified additional associations between microbial profiles and various neurological outcomes.
However, these findings require careful interpretation.
A 2025 Nature Mental Health review, Distinguishing the Causative, Correlative and Bidirectional Roles of the Gut Microbiota in Mental Health, examines the challenge of determining whether microbiome differences contribute to psychiatric symptoms or result from other aspects of illness.
Similarly, a 2026 Translational Psychiatry review, From Association to Causality: Mechanistic Pathways Linking the Gut Microbiome to Psychiatric Disorders, emphasizes the importance of human intervention studies, longitudinal research, and independent replication.
These reviews conclude that current evidence supports plausible relationships but remains insufficient to establish microbiome-targeted interventions as primary treatments for most psychiatric conditions.
This distinction is especially important because disease-associated microbial signatures are not necessarily specific.
Changes in diet, medications, bowel habits, physical activity, and other factors can influence microbial profiles.
A difference between patient and control groups does not automatically establish a clinically useful diagnostic marker.
17. What Can We Learn From Large-Scale Human Microbiome Research?
Advances in sequencing technology have made it possible to investigate microbiome patterns in increasingly large populations.
A study published online in December 2025 in Nature, Gut Micro-organisms Associated With Health, Nutrition and Dietary Interventions, analyzed data from more than 34,000 participants in the United States and United Kingdom.
The researchers investigated associations among gut microbial species, dietary patterns, and cardiometabolic characteristics.
They identified microbial patterns associated with several health-related measures.
These results are valuable because large datasets can help identify associations that are more reproducible across populations.
However, observational associations do not establish that changing one microbial species will improve health.
The study also focused primarily on diet and cardiometabolic outcomes, not direct proof of improved brain function.
Its contribution to the microbiota–gut–brain discussion is methodological.
It illustrates how researchers are moving toward larger datasets that combine dietary, microbial, and physiological information.
Future studies will need to determine which of these relationships can be translated into reliable, individualized interventions.
18. What Can Microbiome Testing Actually Tell Us?
Commercial microbiome testing has become increasingly accessible.
Many tests report bacterial species, relative abundances, diversity measurements, or inferred microbial functions.
These results can be informative in research settings.
However, their clinical interpretation remains limited for many applications.
There is no single universally accepted healthy microbiome composition.
Furthermore, stool samples provide an incomplete representation of the gastrointestinal ecosystem.
They may not accurately describe microbial populations in every intestinal region or reveal the actual activity of microorganisms at the mucosal surface.
Microbial gene abundance also does not necessarily establish which metabolites are being produced or how those metabolites affect the individual.
For these reasons, routine stool microbiome profiling cannot currently diagnose depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, or most neurological disorders.
Nor can a report reliably identify the optimal probiotic or dietary prescription for every individual.
More established clinical tests may be appropriate when specific gastrointestinal symptoms or medical conditions warrant investigation.
The important distinction is between validated diagnostic testing and exploratory microbiome measurements.
19. Practical Implications for Everyday Nutrition
The complexity of the microbiota–gut–brain axis may seem to demand elaborate testing and specialized supplementation.
However, for most individuals, established nutritional principles remain an appropriate starting point.
Dietary variety can help provide a broader range of nutrients and microbial substrates.
Fiber-rich foods support gastrointestinal function and may contribute to microbial fermentation.
Adequate protein intake supports tissue function and metabolic health.
Appropriate dietary fats contribute essential fatty acids and support normal physiological processes.
Fermented foods may be useful additions for some individuals, depending on tolerance and overall dietary context.
However, more is not always better.
Rapid increases in fermentable fiber may cause bloating, abdominal discomfort, or other symptoms, particularly in susceptible individuals.
People with irritable bowel syndrome or other gastrointestinal conditions may require individualized dietary strategies.
Likewise, probiotics should be selected according to the specific condition and available evidence rather than assumed to provide universal benefits.
Most importantly, nutritional interventions should support overall dietary adequacy rather than become narrowly focused on manipulating individual bacterial species.
20. The Future of Precision Nutrition: From Microbial Identification to Functional Understanding
One of the most promising directions in microbiome science involves moving beyond taxonomy.
Taxonomy describes which organisms are present.
Functional analysis investigates their genes, biochemical capabilities, metabolic products, and interactions with the host.
Metabolomics, metagenomics, and other technologies may eventually help researchers identify meaningful differences in how individuals respond to food.
For example, two people consuming similar amounts of dietary fiber may differ in microbial fermentation because their communities possess different metabolic capabilities.
Likewise, individuals may respond differently to dietary changes because of variations in genetics, medications, gastrointestinal function, and habitual eating patterns.
The goal of precision nutrition is to identify which measurements meaningfully improve dietary recommendations.
However, personalization should remain grounded in demonstrated clinical benefit.
More extensive testing does not automatically mean better healthcare.
The most useful information is the information that changes decisions and improves outcomes.
21. How This Research Informs Eat Well
We recognize that nutrition influences multiple interconnected physiological systems.
Food provides the materials necessary for cellular function, but it also interacts with gastrointestinal physiology, microbial metabolism, immune signaling, and endocrine regulation.
The microbiota–gut–brain axis offers an important scientific foundation for understanding these relationships.
Within our Eat Well philosophy, we emphasize comprehensive nutrition education, dietary adequacy, food quality, and individualized strategies that align with the patient's needs and goals.
This may include discussion of dietary fiber, plant-food diversity, macronutrient balance, micronutrient intake, meal timing, digestive tolerance, and broader lifestyle considerations.
We also recognize that gastrointestinal symptoms and nutritional responses vary among individuals.
Some people may benefit from increasing fermentable fibers.
Others may require modified approaches because of gastrointestinal disorders, medication effects, or other clinical considerations.
When appropriate, relevant medical evaluation can help clarify concerns that should not be attributed automatically to the microbiome.
Importantly, we do not claim that microbiome testing can diagnose psychiatric or neurological disease.
Nor do we present probiotics, prebiotics, or dietary interventions as established substitutes for appropriately indicated neurological or mental healthcare.
Instead, our approach integrates established nutritional principles with an informed understanding of emerging research.
Our goal is to help individuals make practical, sustainable dietary decisions while recognizing the complexity of the biological systems influenced by nutrition.
Conclusion: Eating Well Means Nourishing More Than the Human Body Alone
The science of the microbiota–gut–brain axis has changed how researchers understand the relationship between nutrition and human physiology.
The gastrointestinal tract is not simply a digestive tube.
It is an active sensory, endocrine, immune, and metabolic system inhabited by diverse microbial communities.
These microorganisms transform dietary compounds into biologically active metabolites.
Their products interact with intestinal cells, immune pathways, and systems involved in neurological regulation.
At the same time, the brain influences gastrointestinal function and the environment in which these microorganisms live.
Recent advances have revealed increasingly detailed communication pathways involving vagal signaling, specialized intestinal sensory cells, microbial metabolites, immune processes, and brain-resident immune cells.
However, considerable uncertainty remains.
Many discoveries are based on experimental animal studies, and associations between microbial profiles and human neurological outcomes do not necessarily establish causation.
The next challenge is determining which mechanisms can be translated into reliable interventions that improve meaningful health outcomes.
For nutrition, this leads to an important perspective.
We are not simply feeding our cells. We are also providing substrates to a complex microbial ecosystem whose activities interact with our physiology.
We believe this understanding strengthens the case for comprehensive, personalized nutrition.
The goal is not to control every microorganism or chase a theoretically perfect microbiome.
It is to support nutritional adequacy, metabolic health, gastrointestinal function, and long-term well-being through evidence-informed dietary strategies tailored to the individual.
Research References
Cryan JF, O'Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiological Reviews. 2019;99:1877–2013. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00018.2018
Schneider E, O'Riordan KJ, Clarke G, et al. Feeding gut microbes to nourish the brain: unravelling the diet–microbiota–gut–brain axis. Nature Metabolism. 2024;6:1454–1478. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01108-6
Ohara TE, Hsiao EY. Microbiota–neuroepithelial signalling across the gut–brain axis. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2025;23:371–384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01136-9
Aburto MR, Cryan JF. Gastrointestinal and brain barriers: unlocking gates of communication across the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2024;21:222–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00890-0
Keane L, Clarke G, Cryan JF. A role for microglia in mediating the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2025;25:847–861. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-025-01188-9
Ross FC, Patangia D, Grimaud G, et al. The interplay between diet and the gut microbiome: implications for health and disease. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2024;22:671–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01068-4
Delzenne NM, Bindels LB, Neyrinck AM, Walter J. The gut microbiome and dietary fibres: implications in obesity, cardiometabolic diseases and cancer. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2025;23:225–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01108-z
A gut sense for a microbial pattern regulates feeding. Nature. 2025;645:729–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09301-7
Beyond the gut: decoding the gut–immune–brain axis in health and disease. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2025;22:1287–1312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-025-01333-3
Kamath S, Sokolenko E, et al. Distinguishing the causative, correlative and bidirectional roles of the gut microbiota in mental health. Nature Mental Health. 2025;3:1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00498-0
Almarzooqi S, Yassin LK, Hamad MIK, et al. From association to causality: mechanistic pathways linking the gut microbiome to psychiatric disorders. Translational Psychiatry. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-04305-x
Mukherjee A, Breselge S, Dimidi E, Marco ML, Cotter PD, et al. Fermented foods and gastrointestinal health: underlying mechanisms. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2024;21:248–266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00869-x
Gut micro-organisms associated with health, nutrition and dietary interventions. Nature. Published online December 10, 2025; volume 650, pages 450–458 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09854-7
Zhong W, Wang K, Zarrinpar A. Mind over microbiota: neurons call the shots in the gut. Nature Metabolism. 2025;7:1100–1102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-025-01282-1